Amedeo Maiuri’s plan of 1958
Anyone fortunate enough to find a copy of Robert Paget’s book ‘In the Footsteps of Orpheus’, where he describes his discovery of the tunnels at Baia will find that he makes references to the various sections of the bath complex according to the numbered sections in the plan above. The buildings we are concerened with here are in the upper sections of IV and III.
The plan was printed in Amedeo Maiuri’s guidebook ‘I Campi Flegrei’.
A glaring error is that Amedeo’s north isn’t – somehow he has it considerably out of true. As the main tunnel, which Paget called the Great Antrum 270º (ie 270º on the compass) runs exactly east-west, let me correct Amedeo’s drawing to avoid confusion:
Looking closer at the entrances
Amedeo Maiuri gave instructions to his workmen not to investigate the tunnel further back than about the rear of the Tholos. due to the possibility of toxic gases emitting from it.
Workmen cleared the trench below the Greek Temple and thus established the true height of the 400 foot (122 metre) tunnel leading into the hillside, Paget’s Great Antrum 270º.
Maiuri seems to suggest by a double dashed line that the tunnel extended eastwards to an octagonal bath room. Where it entered under the Greek Temple he shows an awkward change in direction before continuing into the hill.
The situation in reality is not quite like this, as we shall see.
An article published in the Art Bulletin of March 1996, called ‘The Thermo-Mineral Complex at Baiae and De Balneis Puteolanis’ by Fikret K. Yegül shows a plan of both the level of the surface buildings – the left drawing – and the level below it – the right drawing. Yegül states his plans are after Maiuri and indeed he copies the wrong north direction of Maiuri’s original plan on both of his drawings.
The drawing clearly shows that on the lower level there is a building with its corner cut across, with an entrance to a tunnel. Although this is shown going only a short distance towards the hill, in fact it joins up with the tunnel under the Greek Temple which he shows in the other drawing.
Paget examined the outer wall of the Roman building where the tunnel cuts across it and said there are signs that the Roman concrete bears the imprint of much larger stone blocks, which were taken away afterwards. Paget concluded that the Romans poured concrete against the ancient blocks which were later taken away after they had served their purpose as shuttering for the concrete.
On Yegül’s upper level drawing we can see that he shows a dotted passage leading to chamber at the top centre right of the plan. This was a tunnel that was the first to be investigated by Paget and Jones in 1962. Like the main complex of tunnels, it had been deliberately blocked and filled with earth in Roman times, before the site was buried in volcanic ash. Paget and Jones made metal scoops for their hands and in their own words burrowed in like rabbits. The tunnel angle shown here is wrong, but the tunnel does lead to a chamber within the hill, with some other extremely narrow tunnels running from it. As Paget and Jones dug this tunnel out, presumably the addition on this later plan is as a result of their work.
Yegül, or Maiuri if Yegül is copying his drawing here, seems to have extrapolated this tunnel-to-chamber idea by adding a similar chamber to Paget’s Great Antrum 270º. In reality it does nothing of the kind. Yegül should have known this as he was aware of Paget’s work and he quotes Paget’s paper ‘The ‘Great Antrum’ at Baiae: A Preliminary Report‘ (Papers of the British School at Rome).
Yegül elsewhere takes Paget’s measurement of the tunnels extending 300 metres into the hill at face value, but dismisses the whole notion of a ritual site as ‘fanciful and controversial’. He has clearly not been down there, as a he makes an error by stating that the sanctuary ‘might have provided a rest station just before the steep descent into the boiling sources of water and sulfurous vapors’. The sanctuary is not on the way to the water at all, it lies above it. It does not reside before the steep descent to the Styx, which starts at the dividing door some distance before it.
R F Paget’s entrances, discovered in the early 1960s
What Paget found was the three entrance tunnels shown at left in red, with a fourth tunnel leading from the temple to a point above the main tunnel. There is a wider tunnel leading from the building with the corner cut off which meets the tunnel under the temple. It is on a bearing of 280º.
Entrance one starts about 6 feet or 1.825 metres from the corner of the Temple, where it constricts to a width of about 22 inches or 0.55 of a metre and changes direction to 275º, before continuing this direction in a gun barrel straight line until an S bend obscures the view of a dividing door beyond it. A further complex set of tunnels proceeds from this point.
The other two entrances Paget called The Original Entrance, adjacent to the Greek Temple and at the back of the Tholos.
The Tholos entrance has been bricked up where it meets the main tunnel. A Roman pipe once lead into the main tunnel from outside the hill. Its remains sit on a shelf. The pipe leads back through the bricked up entrance to the Tholos tunnel and this is how the Romans pumped hot water into the later bath conversion. Hot water and steam for the baths did not come from within the hill here. The tunnel leads the wrong way for water flow, it slopes into the hill, not out.
The tunnel leading from a chamber at the back of the Greek Temple is at a higher level and is assumed to lead to where there is a tile set in the tunnel roof below at the junction of the main tunnel and the tunnel from the Tholos. The passage is blocked some way in by a land fall.
The tunnels themselves will be discussed elsewhere on this site.